Ethical Decision Making in Clinical Neuropsychology: A Comprehensive Guide

Ethical decision making is a critical aspect of clinical neuropsychology, a field that involves the assessment and treatment of individuals with cognitive, emotional, and behavioral challenges. Neuropsychologists are often called upon to make complex decisions that can have a profound impact on the lives of their patients and their families.

Ethical Decision Making in Clinical Neuropsychology (AACN Workshop Series)

5 out of 5

Language	:	English
File size	:	935 KB
Text-to-Speech	:	Enabled
Screen Reader	:	Supported
Enhanced typesetting	:	Enabled
Word Wise	:	Enabled
Print length	:	216 pages
Lending	:	Enabled

FREE

The American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology (AACN) has developed a comprehensive workshop series to provide neuropsychologists with the knowledge and skills they need to make ethical decisions in their practice. This guide will provide an overview of the AACN Workshop Series and discuss the key ethical principles that guide decision making in clinical neuropsychology.

The AACN Workshop Series

The AACN Workshop Series on Ethical Decision Making in Clinical Neuropsychology is a four-part series that covers a wide range of ethical issues. The workshops are designed to be interactive and engaging, and they provide participants with the opportunity to learn from and discuss with other neuropsychologists. The workshops are also designed to be practical, and they provide participants with tools and resources that they can use in their own practice.

The four workshops in the series are:

• Workshop 1: to Ethical Decision Making in Clinical Neuropsychology
• Workshop 2: Ethical Issues in Assessment
• Workshop 3: Ethical Issues in Treatment
• Workshop 4: Ethical Issues in Research

Key Ethical Principles

The AACN Workshop Series on Ethical Decision Making in Clinical Neuropsychology is based on the following key ethical principles:

• Respect for autonomy: Neuropsychologists must respect the autonomy of their patients and their families. This means that neuropsychologists must involve patients in decision making and must respect their decisions, even if they disagree with them.
• Beneficence: Neuropsychologists must act in the best interests of their patients and their families. This means that neuropsychologists must provide the best possible care and must avoid ng anything that could harm their patients.
• Non-maleficence: Neuropsychologists must do no harm. This means that neuropsychologists must avoid ng anything that could cause physical or psychological harm to their patients.
• Justice: Neuropsychologists must treat all patients fairly and equitably. This means that neuropsychologists must not discriminate against patients based on their race, gender, religion, sexual orientation, or other factors.

Ethical decision making is a complex and challenging process, but it is essential for clinical neuropsychologists. The AACN Workshop Series on Ethical Decision Making in Clinical Neuropsychology provides neuropsychologists with the knowledge and skills they need to make ethical decisions in their practice. The workshops are based on the key ethical principles of respect for autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice.

By following these principles, neuropsychologists can help to ensure that their patients receive the best possible care and that they are treated with dignity and respect.

Ethical Decision Making in Clinical Neuropsychology (AACN Workshop Series)

5 out of 5

Language	:	English
File size	:	935 KB
Text-to-Speech	:	Enabled
Screen Reader	:	Supported
Enhanced typesetting	:	Enabled
Word Wise	:	Enabled
Print length	:	216 pages
Lending	:	Enabled

FREE